My uncle was a member of the People’s Mujahedin of Iran; he was arrested in 1982 and, after spending three years in prison, was consequently executed and buried in an abandoned graveyard in Behesht-e Zahra. This section, which is completely dried up, belongs to people who were killed in state-sponsored executions of political prisoners across Iran during the 1980s. The majority of those killed were supporters of the People’s Mujahedin of Iran, although supporters of other leftist factions, including the Fedaian and the Tudeh Party of Iran (Communist Party), were executed as well. In some cases, the tombstones did not dare bear the name of the person lying under them.
The graveyard is surrounded by other graveyards, all covered with plants, trees and flowers. We would visit the cemetery, and as a child, I always wondered how this small piece of land where my uncle is buried was so different from other parts of the cemetery. There were broken tombstones lying around with only a name or date of birth/death; there were holes in the ground next to the graves where you could find papers or other objects with spells written on them, which someone buried there with the hopes of having their wish granted by the dead or other beings, I suppose. My uncle’s tombstone, along with others, was broken at times; we would immediately replace it with a new one, but it was only a matter of time before the cycle was repeated. To us, it was obvious who was to blame—the same people we blamed for his death–those who resented the departed and what he stood for so much that they couldn’t even leave his grave alone after all these years. It became clear to me later that it wasn’t about him anymore and that through this act they were trying to send a message, establishing themselves as agents of a state that will haunt you down even after it ends your life for not playing by their rules. Just like that, the tombstones became vital objects, battlegrounds that, from where we were standing, had the potentiality to act as inanimate agents of resistance.
It is possible to rethink our perceptions of ‘objects’ or ‘subjects’ and what they mean and the functions that get assigned to each one. Objects aren’t necessarily passive; they’re materialization of processes that are constantly undergoing transformation and being redefined. So all matter is alive and in process: a complex, interwoven web of materials, all affecting each other, competing, forming alliances, initiating new processes and dissipating others. Humans are unavoidably trapped in these webs.